From 0fab80d617a3bbdb95d0da7609cfc821d73cd06d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: RossTheRoss <mstrapp@protonmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 19:34:24 -0600
Subject: add to gitignore

---
 csci4511w/writing1.tex | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 csci4511w/writing1.tex

diff --git a/csci4511w/writing1.tex b/csci4511w/writing1.tex
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f4ee136
--- /dev/null
+++ b/csci4511w/writing1.tex
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+\documentclass{article}
+\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
+\usepackage{parskip}
+
+\title{Writing 1}
+\author{Matt Strapp}
+\date{2021-02-12}
+\begin{document}
+   \maketitle
+   \section*{Trust and Ethics for AVs}
+   One of the most important things in the study of ethics is its defintion. Instead of using the defintion supplied in the paper, I will define ethical behavior as the following:   
+   \begin{quote}
+      \emph{Ethical behavior is behavior that while not always for the better for the individual is beneficial for society as a whole.}
+   \end{quote}
+   While this is a flawed defintion, I will use it as I disagree with the one given and believe that utilitarianism would be better for AI purposes. Everything after this will be based on that opinion.
+
+   The paper defines four different definitions for 
+   \begin{quote}
+      \emph{(SN-0) A robot (or AI or AV) will never harm a human being.}
+   \end{quote}
+   
+   \begin{quote}
+      \emph{(SN-1) A robot will never deliberately harm a human being.}
+   \end{quote}
+
+   \begin{quote}
+      \emph{(SN-2) In a given situation, a robot will be no more likely than a skilled and alert human 
+      to accidentally harm a human being.}
+   \end{quote}
+
+   \begin{quote}
+      \emph{(SN-3) A robot must learn to anticipate and avoid Deadly Dilemmas. }
+   \end{quote}
+    
+
+\end{document}
\ No newline at end of file
-- 
cgit v1.2.3