From 8181af891a5667c0a445388835b9294f02c7b387 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: RossTheRoss <mstrapp@protonmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 19:53:55 -0600
Subject: c

---
 csci4511w/writing1.tex | 26 ++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

(limited to 'csci4511w/writing1.tex')

diff --git a/csci4511w/writing1.tex b/csci4511w/writing1.tex
index f4ee136..9dbdcc3 100644
--- a/csci4511w/writing1.tex
+++ b/csci4511w/writing1.tex
@@ -8,28 +8,34 @@
 \begin{document}
    \maketitle
    \section*{Trust and Ethics for AVs}
-   One of the most important things in the study of ethics is its defintion. Instead of using the defintion supplied in the paper, I will define ethical behavior as the following:   
+   One of the most important things in the study of ethics is its defintion.
+   Instead of using the defintion supplied in the paper, I will define ethical behavior as the following:   
    \begin{quote}
       \emph{Ethical behavior is behavior that while not always for the better for the individual is beneficial for society as a whole.}
    \end{quote}
-   While this is a flawed defintion, I will use it as I disagree with the one given and believe that utilitarianism would be better for AI purposes. Everything after this will be based on that opinion.
+   While this is a flawed defintion, I will use it as I disagree with the one given and believe that utilitarianism would be better for AI purposes.
 
-   The paper defines four different definitions for 
+
+   The paper defines four different definitions for ethics in the case of autonomous vehicles (AVs).
+   All of these involve protecting the human cargo that vehicles contain if they would ever fail.
+   While oversimplified this can also be extrapolated to protecting non-human cargo by replacing ``human being'' with something else.
+
+   The first social norm (SN) is as follows:
    \begin{quote}
       \emph{(SN-0) A robot (or AI or AV) will never harm a human being.}
    \end{quote}
-   
+   The paper correctly defines SN-0 as being practically impossible, as there are some instances where harm cannot be avoided.
+   Dealing with this, SN-1 directly supersedes SN-0.
    \begin{quote}
-      \emph{(SN-1) A robot will never deliberately harm a human being.}
+      \emph{(SN-1) A robot will never \textbf{deliberately} harm a human being.}
    \end{quote}
-
+   This law is incomplete without its corollary:
    \begin{quote}
-      \emph{(SN-2) In a given situation, a robot will be no more likely than a skilled and alert human 
-      to accidentally harm a human being.}
+      \emph{(SN-2) In a given situation, a robot will be no more likely than a skilled and alert human to accidentally harm a human being.}
    \end{quote}
-
+   Both SN-1 and SN-2 are alternate tallings of both the Hippocratic oath and Asimov's first law of robotics
    \begin{quote}
-      \emph{(SN-3) A robot must learn to anticipate and avoid Deadly Dilemmas. }
+      \emph{(SN-3) A robot must learn to anticipate and avoid Deadly Dilemmas.}
    \end{quote}
     
 
-- 
cgit v1.2.3